Privacy News Highlights

07–20 July 2007

 

Contents:

EU – German Test of Facial Recognition by Computer Fails. 2

EU – New Technology Records Emotions of Passers-By. 2

US – U.S. Building Database on Iraqis - Biometrics Key Part of Tracking Suspects. 2

AU – Unisys Survey: Australian Travellers Happy With Bio Checks. 2

IN – India Gov’t to Launch Biometric PAN Cards. 3

CA – U.S. Data Broker Fooled Canadian Phone Companies Into Giving Up Personal Data. 3

CA – Privacy Commissioner May Investigate Trans-Border Flow of Private Information. 3

WW – 30 Countries Sign OECD Document to Protect Consumers Online. 3

US – Consumers Eligible for $14 Million Settlement for Alleged Privacy Violations. 3

UK – Survey: Anti-Spam Solutions Get Battering From Business. 4

US – VA to Expand Encryption to In-House Removable Storage. 4

UK – UK Firms “Guilty of ‘Horrifying’ Breaches in Data Privacy” – Richard Thomas. 4

UK – U.K. Politicians Push for Data Policy Debate. 4

UK – Survey: 3 in 10 PCs Dumped With Sensitive Data. 5

WW – Survey: Companies Continue to Feel Vulnerable to Security Attacks. 5

WW – New RSA Research: Criminals Set Up Phishing Sites in Seconds. 5

US – Survey Finds Information Requests Can Take Years. 5

CA – B.C. Can Keep Contracting Out Medical Records, Court Rules. 6

UK – NHS Looks at Tagging Hospital Patients with RFID, Barcodes, Biometrics. 6

US – Breach Exposes Personal Data for 27,000 Online Customers. 6

US – Personal Data on 80,000 Exposed on Louisiana Internet Site. 6

UK – Assistant Commissioner Bamford: ID Cards Must Keep Public Confidence. 6

WW – Anonymizer.com Web Service Discontinued. 7

WW – Microsoft Windows Patent Will Spy for Advertisers. 7

US – FBI Remotely Installs Spyware to Trace Bomb Threat 7

WW – Google Announces Shorter Lifespan for Cookies. 7

EU – Nintendo Revises Privacy Policy; EU Users Must Agree or Cancel Membership. 7

US – Security Researcher Wants AstroGlide Maker Fined For Slippery Privacy Practices. 8

WW – “I’ve Got Nothing to Hide” and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy: Solove Essay. 8

US – Court OKs Pat-Down Searches of Football Fans. 8

EU – European Task Force Lists RFID Privacy Threats. 8

US – AMA Issues Ethics Code for RFID Chip Implants. 9

US – Think Tank Makes Case Against RFID Regulation. 9

US – OMB, DHS Outline Data Security Best Practices. 9

US – Survey: Employees Pose the Biggest Security Risk. 9

CA – Payment Industry Preps for Ontario Chip Card Trial 10

EU – Report: Public Surveillance a Threat to Fundamental Rights. 10

UK – Police Gain Data Protection Exemption for London Surveillance. 10

US – New York Plans Surveillance Veil for Downtown. 10

US – Feds Scramble to Meet Data Breach Deadline. 10

US – Ambitious US e-Government Project Targets Secure Data Sharing. 11

US – FBI Plans More Data-Mining, Profiling. 11

US – Senators Introduce Stringent Health Records Privacy Bill 11

US – House Panel Slaps Limits on Sale of SSNs. 11

US – Coalition of Groups Urges FTC to Investigate Background Checks on Rail Workers. 11


 

EU – German Test of Facial Recognition by Computer Fails

The German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) this week presented sobering research results of its visual-image search systems project, concluding that biometric visual-image search systems are not advanced enough to be used by the police to search for persons. Given the present state of the technology the system was unfit to be deployed, the Office concluded. The crime researchers are placing their hopes on 3D recognition facial systems, the development of which is still in its infancy, however. The Federal Data Protection Commissioner Peter Schaar is also warning against the use of an immature technology. In his statement on the final report of the BKA on the project Commissioner Schaar made it clear that biometric facial recognition technology must on no account, even if at some point in the future the point of maturity was reached, lead to an all-round surveillance regime. “Especially problematic are false positives, which, in the event of a genuine hunt, render innocent people suspects for a time, create a need for justification on their part and make further checks by the authorities unavoidable,” Mr. Schaar declared. [Source] This would generate a pervasive climate of surveillance, which in turn would impact upon the behavior of citizens. The Commissioner also demanded legal safeguards against the linking of the image data recorded by surveillance cameras with the digital passport photographs stored in the passport and ID registers. [Source] [Source] [Source]

 

EU – New Technology Records Emotions of Passers-By

German researchers have developed a new tool to recognize emotions as they flicker across the human face. Rapid facial analysis has huge potential for advertisers, but some are concerned about protecting privacy. Usually, advertisers can only guess at the public’s reaction to a new ad campaign. But new technology under development by German researchers makes that type of data instantly accessible to advertisers. A small video camera records the face of each person who passes and registers whether the person looks happy, surprised, sad or angry. Complex algorithms find faces in a video image, count the number of people watching an ad, distinguish between men and women and analyze their expressions. Plus, it all happens in real time. [Source] [Source] [Demonstration version of the face detection and analysis software package] See also: [Homeland Security Sees Lasers and Heart Sensors in the Future of Anti-Terror Screening]

 

US – U.S. Building Database on Iraqis - Biometrics Key Part of Tracking Suspects

The U.S. military is taking fingerprints and eye scans from thousands of Iraqi men and building an unprecedented database that helps track suspected militants. U.S. troops are stopping Iraqis at checkpoints, workplaces and sites where attacks have recently occurred, and inputting their personal data using handheld scanners or specially equipped laptops. In several neighbourhoods in and around Baghdad, troops have gone door to door collecting data. The rapidly expanding program has raised privacy concerns at the Pentagon, although it has met little resistance from Iraqis. [Source]

 

AU – Unisys Survey: Australian Travellers Happy With Bio Checks

Research by biometrics technology firm Unisys suggests that 98% of Australians are prepared to use a photograph to establish their identity, while three in four are happy to have their fingerprints taken and 69% would agree to iris scans. Unisys found more than half of domestic travellers would be prepared to pay a higher ticket price if it produced tangible security improvements, and 71% would be prepared to provide biometric data to airlines. The technology company, which is helping develop facial recognition and fingerprint technology for border security in Australia, believes the acceptance of the increased security measures means it will only be a matter of time before there is a registered traveller scheme in Australia. The company says its research shows more than two-thirds of travellers would be prepared to participate in some sort of scheme if they thought they would benefit. [Source] [Biometrics New Australian Border Guard by 2010]

 

IN – India Gov’t to Launch Biometric PAN Cards

All the new income tax payers in the country will soon begin to get biometric Permanent Account Number (PAN) cards with enhanced security features like fingerprints or retinal scans, aimed at checking duplicate cards and better tax compliance. “The process of eliminating about 13 lakh duplicate PAN cards is in last mile. Once that process is completed shortly, then we will set a date, after which all new PAN cards will only be biometric,” When asked whether the date of launching biometric PANs could be October, the Indian Finance Minister said, “it could be.” Referring to the fate of current PAN card holders, Chidambaram said, “they will be persuaded to switch over to biometric PAN cards in their own interest. Earlier PAN cards will, of course, remain valid.” [Source]

 

CA – U.S. Data Broker Fooled Canadian Phone Companies Into Giving Up Personal Data

The Canadian Privacy Commissioner says a U.S.-based data broker tricked Canadian telephone company personnel into divulging confidential information about customers. A probe by Jennifer Stoddart found staff at broker Locatecell.com obtained the personal details by pretending to be people entitled to the information. The probe was prompted by a November 2005 article in Maclean’s alleging the magazine had been able to purchase the phone records of Stoddart and a senior Maclean’s editor from Locatecell.com. Stoddart concluded Bell Canada, Telus Mobility and Fido did not follow their own procedures and had not adequately trained staff to protect customer info. All 3 companies have since revised their customer authentication procedures. [Source] [News Release] [Commissioner’s Finding]

 

CA – Privacy Commissioner May Investigate Trans-Border Flow of Private Information

The Federal Court has ruled that the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) gives the Privacy Commissioner jurisdiction to investigate the trans-border flow of personal information, according to the decision. The ruling stemmed from a complaint that a U.S.-based Web site was advertising that it could provide background checks, telephone numbers, license plate numbers, psychological profiles and other information on individuals, including Canadians. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner said it was unable to investigate, citing the lack of jurisdiction in the U.S. The Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic’s Executive Director, Philippa Lawson, said she was surprised that the privacy commissioner declined to investigate her organization’s complaint. A spokeswoman for the privacy commissioner said the office was “pleased with the decision that gives us the jurisdiction to investigate the matter.”  [Source]

 

WW – 30 Countries Sign OECD Document to Protect Consumers Online

Spurred to find ways to protect consumers as online shopping grows, the 30 countries belonging to the international economic and social-development group Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) this week announced an accord on dispute resolution. After two years of wrangling over the policy document, the Paris-based OECD said its 30 members have signed off on a legal framework intended to lead to better policing and resolution of consumer complaints, particularly in cross-border disputes involving e-commerce. [Source]

 

US – Consumers Eligible for $14 Million Settlement for Alleged Privacy Violations

Bank of America (BofA) has agreed to a settle class action lawsuit for $14 million that alleged consumer privacy violations. The bank has agreed to changes related to its privacy policies, Web site and opt-out procedures. The bank also agreed to pay $10.75 million on waiving fees for certain bank products and services and for credit monitoring coverage to protect people from identity theft. The lawsuit, which was filed in September 1999, alleged that the bank engaged in “unlawful, unfair and fraudulent” conduct by “disclosing consumers’ personal, private, confidential information to third parties without consumers’ consent or without making proper disclosure.” The bank has agreed to provide $3.25 million for privacy programs, including $1.5 million for nonprofit organizations that work to protect consumers’ privacy. Consumers who had a BofA card at anytime from Sept. 9, 1995 until May 31, 2007 are eligible to file a claim by Oct. 1. [Source]

 

UK – Survey: Anti-Spam Solutions Get Battering From Business

Most businesses are unhappy with the performance of their anti-spam technologies, a survey has found. The survey, entitled The Spam Index Report, found that most customers were not fully satisfied with the service they received from anti-spam vendors. Over 500 businesses were polled by IT consultants Brockmann & Company, with 40% of the respondents having IT responsibilities. Respondents found anti-spam services provided by ISPs to be the least effective of all solutions. Spam filters were found to be the next most ineffectual method of killing spam. Only 21% of respondents were “very satisfied” with their user-trained PC email client spam filters. Open-source and proprietary email client filters were almost equally ineffectual, according to the survey. [Source] [The Spam Index Report]

 

US – VA to Expand Encryption to In-House Removable Storage

The Veterans Affairs Department will now require encryption for portable storage devices used internally effective in December because of a data breach at its medical center in Birmingham, Ala., earlier this year. VA already requires the use of encrypted flash drives, hard drives and other removable devices when employees have permission to take personally identifiable data off site. Now the agency will coordinate with the Office of Management and Budget and the President’s Identity Theft Task Force to develop governmentwide criteria for determining under what conditions potential identity theft victims should be notified and offered free credit monitoring, said Robert Howard, VA’s chief information officer, in a letter to the agency’s Office of Inspector General in late June. [Source]

 

UK – UK Firms “Guilty of ‘Horrifying’ Breaches in Data Privacy” – Richard Thomas

A ‘horrifying’ number of organisations have breached data-protection rules, according to a report by the UK information commissioner, Richard Thomas. Company bosses must take the security of employees’ and customers’ personal information seriously, he warned. In his annual report, Mr Thomas criticises a catalogue of security lapses. ‘The roll-call of banks, retailers, government departments, public bodies and other organisations which have admitted serious security lapses is horrifying,’ he said. ‘My message to those at the top of organisations is... to be sure you are not the business or political leader who failed to take information rights seriously.’ The information commissioner’s office received nearly 24,000 inquiries and complaints about personal information issues in 2006-2007. [Source] [Annual Report] See also: [UK UK Information Commissioner’s Office to set up own IT forensics department to support its enforcement activities] and [Experts: UK Businesses Fall Behind On PCI Compliance] and [The Guardian Praises UK Information Commissioner]

 

UK – U.K. Politicians Push for Data Policy Debate

As the result of new data sharing proposals by UK ministers, Liberal Democrats are seeking a debate on government use of its databases. after uncovering details of disagreements within the government about moves to pass automated number plate recognition (ANPR) data from congestion charging and future road pricing cameras to police. Details of the plans – and disagreements – were in a document inadvertently released by the Home Office as it made a formal announcement that Transport for London would share the ANPR data gathered for the capital’s congestion charging scheme with police. Said an opposition MP: “Bit by bit, vast computer databases are being made interoperable and yet the government seems to be running scared of a full and public debate on the safeguards needed to make such information-sharing acceptable.” And “The government appears to be using the London cameras as a Trojan Horse to secure unprecedented access to information on car drivers’ movements without full public scrutiny or debate. “It is high time for a full debate on the use of information databases by this government.” [Source]See also: [UK PM urges relaxed privacy for U.K. data sharing bills]

 

UK – Survey: 3 in 10 PCs Dumped With Sensitive Data

As much as a third of corporate PCs sent for disposal by UK companies could contain sensitive data, according to a survey conducted by Vanson Bourne on behalf of Lenovo, the PC maker. The survey of 300 businesses reveals these lapses in data security occur across the board in equal measure in both mid-size and large enterprises. Most companies have little idea about what is being stored on their computers. More than half of the respondents said they allowed employees to save all types of file to their computers, including company financial and legal information. Only one in ten had strict guidelines for employees on how to regularly clean up and audit their hard discs. Lenovo also used the survey launch to promote its Secure Data Disposal product, which removes data from hard drives. [Source]

 

WW – Survey: Companies Continue to Feel Vulnerable to Security Attacks

Two-thirds of 1,101 survey respondents in the U.S. and 89% of those surveyed in China are feeling as vulnerable to security attacks this year as they were during the previous 12 months, according to InformationWeek Research’s 10th annual Global Information Security survey. Conducted with consulting firm Accenture, the survey found that one of the major concerns for companies is “managing the complexity of security” and a system that has overlapping technologies “that don’t handle security in a straightforward manner.” [Source]. 

 

WW – New RSA Research: Criminals Set Up Phishing Sites in Seconds

Hackers are able to create a fully-working phishing site within two seconds, warns the latest Online Fraud Report from IT security specialist RSA. Researchers at the company’s Anti-Fraud Command Centre (AFCC) said that phishing gangs can get a fully-functional phishing website installed on a compromised host in a matter of seconds. The hackers simply have to double click on a single file to do so. [Source] See also: [Hackers steal government, corporate data with fake job postings]

 

US – Survey Finds Information Requests Can Take Years

On July 2, the National Security Archive posted on its Web site the latest Knight Open Government Survey, entitled "40 Years of FOIA, 20 Years of Delay: Oldest Pending Freedom of Information Requests Date Back to the 1980s." The survey once again highlighted the prolonged problem of undue delays and extensive backlogs accumulating under the FOIA request for information mechanism. The survey found FOIA requests in the federal government dating back to the 1980s.  Five agencies have pending requests older then 15 years, and 10 agencies misreported their oldest pending FOIA requests to Congress in their Financial Year 2006 Annual FOIA Reports. [Source]

 

CA – B.C. Can Keep Contracting Out Medical Records, Court Rules

B.C.’s appeal court has ruled that the province can continue contracting a private company to maintain public health records, rejecting claims that the practice violates federal and provincial laws. It’s a victory for Premier Gordon Campbell and his Liberals and a defeat for the B.C. Government and Service Employees Union. [Source]

 

UK – NHS Looks at Tagging Hospital Patients with RFID, Barcodes, Biometrics

The National Patient Safety Agency has issued a report that found 24,382 incidents of patients “being mismatched with their care.” To improve patient safety, the NHS is considering biometric, RFID and other technologies that could reduce these treatment and medication errors. However, the Information Commissioner’s Office said that use of any technologies that require the collection and storage of biometric data requires careful consideration beforehand. [Source] [How RFID will improve patient safety] [Source]

 

US – Breach Exposes Personal Data for 27,000 Online Customers

Names, addresses and credit card information for 27,000 online customers of computer memory vendor Kingston Technology Company Inc. were compromised during an intrusion into the company’s computer system that occurred in September 2005, according to coverage of the breach in Computerworld. A spokesman for the California company said after the company confirmed what data was compromised and what customers were affected, the company “had to gather the appropriate contact information and arrange for consumer protection services and materials to notify the impacted consumers.” It is unclear when the company detected the attack. The company hired a computer forensics firm to investigate the breach and help Kingston upgrade its security. It also is offering credit monitoring and other services for affected customers, according to this article. [Source]

 

US – Personal Data on 80,000 Exposed on Louisiana Internet Site

Student names, addresses, birth dates and Social Security numbers were available publicly for as long as two years on an internal Internet site run by the Louisiana Board of Regents. The report indicates that most of the site was password-protected. However, the location of the sensitive personal data was publicly available. After the television station informed the board about the breach, the data was taken down from the site. [Source]

 

Horror Story Roundup: [Software consultant who stole data on 110,000 people gets five-year sentence] and [Disney Movie Club members victimized in latest data-breach horror show] and [Missing TSA Computer Drive Not Protected] [Texas - Secretary of  State Site Leaks Personal Data] [Louisiana - LBR site exposed details of 80,000 + to ID Theft]

 

UK – Assistant Commissioner Bamford: ID Cards Must Keep Public Confidence

The UK government should seek to retain public confidence in its controversial ID card scheme by placing privacy issues at the heart of its technology requirements, assistant information commissioner Jonathan Bamford said at a Kable identity management conference this week, as this could both improve the effectiveness of the scheme and show the public the government cares about data protection issues. He added that systems should be built where data protection compliance can be designed in, rather than being tacked on ‘as an afterthought’. [Source]

 

WW – Anonymizer.com Web Service Discontinued

A slashdot user posts: “With no fanfare, and apparently no outcry from the privacy community, Anonymizer Inc. discontinued its web-based Private Surfing service effective June 20, 2007. No reason was given, either on the Anonymizer web site or on founder Lance Cottrell’s privacy blog. Private Surfing customers are now required to download a anonymizing client that handles all TCP traffic, but the program is Windows-only (with Vista support still a work-in-progress).” [Source] [Anonymizer]

 

WW – Microsoft Windows Patent Will Spy for Advertisers

Microsoft has filed a patent that threatens to breathe life into Bill Gates’ and Ray Ozzie’s Frankenstein-like Windows Live “vision”, unveiled in November 2005, for putting annoying, in-your-face internet adverts inside your most important Windows applications. The giant has claimed what it calls an “advertising framework” that would suck “context data” from your PC so advertisers can display ads on the client, and to split revenue with the advertiser and the owner of the application supplying the data. According to the patent, any application such as a word processor or email client - may “serve as both a source of context data and as a display client.” Microsoft’s advertising framework would also stipulate “acceptable” advertising - so no porn popping up in your Dynamics CRM or ads for SAP - “restrictions on use of alternate display clients” (so no money for you, Linux), and “specifying supporting media” - forget Real Player and QuickTime, the future is Silverlight. The patent, filed with the US patent and trademark office, would allow for more targeted, relevant and context-sensitive ads, according to Microsoft. [Source] [Source] [Patent Filing]

 

US – FBI Remotely Installs Spyware to Trace Bomb Threat

The FBI used a novel type of remotely installed spyware last month to investigate who was e-mailing bomb threats to a high school near Olympia, Wash. Federal agents obtained a court order on June 12 to send spyware called CIPAV to a MySpace account suspected of being used by the bomb threat hoaxster. Once implanted, the software was designed to report back to the FBI with the Internet Protocol address of the suspect’s computer, other information found on the PC and, notably, an ongoing log of the user’s outbound connections. While there’s been plenty of speculation about how the FBI might deliver spyware electronically, this case appears to be the first to reveal how the technique is used in practice. [Source] See also: [News.com survey of 13 security (anti-spyware) vendors on their general policy to detect police spyware][Verbatim results of survey].

 

WW – Google Announces Shorter Lifespan for Cookies

Google has announced that its cookies will delete automatically after two years, significantly cutting the former deletion date of 2038. However, if a user returns to a Google Web site, the cookie will re-set for another two years. Peter Fleischer, Google’s Global Privacy Counsel - Europe, said that the change was made “after listening to feedback from our users and from privacy advocates.”  [Source] [Google Blogspot] see also: [Mounting Scrutiny for Google Security] [Google cookie expiration plans called ‘worthless’] [EU may push Google further on privacy; Cookies may not be crumbly enough] and, finally, [Lauren Weinstein’s “I Am the Very Model of a Modern Major Googler“] Other Google news: [Congress to scrutinize Google-DoubleClick deal]

 

EU – Nintendo Revises Privacy Policy; EU Users Must Agree or Cancel Membership

Nintendo recently sent out two emails, on June 29 and July 12, which gave users until July 15 to agree to the new terms of its privacy policy or face cancellation of their memberships as well as loss of their Star points. Nintendo said the revised policy allows the company to gather data regarding users’ online activities on its Web site in an effort to improve its products and better meet users’ needs. The new policy allows the company to track users’ browsing habits on the Web site and their use of the Wii system. [Source]

 

US – Security Researcher Wants AstroGlide Maker Fined For Slippery Privacy Practices

Security researcher Christopher Soghoian is petitioning the FTC and state attorneys general to slap millions in fines on Biofilm, the maker of the popular sexual lubricant Astroglide, following the company’s accidental release of more than 250,000 customer names and addresses onto the internet in April. Using a $90 fine per person levied on Victoria’s Secret by New York for a similar leak in 2002, Soghoian estimates the company is liable for an $18 million fine. [Source]

 

WW – “I’ve Got Nothing to Hide” and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy: Solove Essay

In a short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the “nothing to hide” argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: “I’ve got nothing to hide.” According to the “nothing to hide” argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The “nothing to hide” argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the “nothing to hide” argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings. [Source] [Discussion] [Abstract and Paper posted at SSRN] SEE ALSO: [Privacy Isn’t Dead, or At Least It Shouldn’t Be: Q&A with Latanya Sweeney]

 

US – Court OKs Pat-Down Searches of Football Fans

A legal challenge to pat-down searches at San Francisco 49ers home games got a brush-off from a state appeals court, which said the two fans who filed the suit had consented to the searches when they bought their season tickets. In a 2-1 ruling, the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco sidestepped the question of whether the pat-downs ordered by the National Football League in 2005 as an anti-terrorism measure are an invasion of privacy. Instead, the court said spectators waive their right to privacy when they show up for the games after learning about the searches. While a government agency can’t require members of the public to waive their rights in order to receive services, private citizens have more options and thus fewer rights when dealing with private businesses such as the 49ers, the court said. [Source] [Commentary]

 

EU – European Task Force Lists RFID Privacy Threats

RFID technology is not yet sophisticated enough to pose a threat to our privacy. But this could change in the very near future, and measures must be in place to safeguard personal data and secure personal freedom for when that change occurs, according to STOA, the European Parliament’s Scientific Technology Options Assessment body. Through a series of case studies, the researchers contracted by STOA were able to build up a picture of how RFID is perceived by consumers and those running the technology. They found that consumers generally see RFID as little more than an electronic key, while to the owners of the RFID systems, the technology enables them to register the movement, spending power, productivity, preferences and habits of the users. This access to personal information has been the cause for concern by many consumer protection watchdogs, who have argued that the deployment of this technology could have a serious adverse effect on people’s privacy. The researchers found several cases of personal data being abused. The study concludes by making the following recommendations:

·         RFID users need to know what the owners of RFID systems can and are allowed to do with their data;

·         RFID users should play a role in developing new RFID environments;

·         if personal data from different RFID systems are merged it should remain clear who is responsible for handling these data;

·         privacy guidelines and the concepts of personal data and informational self-determination need to be reconsidered in the light of an increasingly interactive environment;

·         governments should take a clear stance on whether RFID bulk data will be mined for investigation purposes.

[Source] [Source] [Report]  See also: [RFID Symposium, Thursday, July 19, 2007, University of Washington School of Law]

 

US – AMA Issues Ethics Code for RFID Chip Implants

The American Medical Association (AMA) has officially established a code of ethics designed to protect patients receiving RFID implants. The recommendations focus on safeguarding a patient’s privacy and health, and are the result of an evaluation by the AMA’s Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA ) regarding the medical and ethical implications of RFID chips in humans, as well as a follow-up report recently released. The latter discusses the possible advantages and specific privacy and ethical issues of using RFID-enabled implantations for clinical purposes. Entitled “Radio Frequency ID Devices in Humans,” the report is presented by Robert M. Sade, M.D., who chairs the CEJA.  It acknowledges that RFID’s use in health care “represents another promising development in information technology, but also raises important ethical, legal and social issues.” The report adds, “Specifically, the use of RFID labeling in humans for medical purposes may improve patient safety, but also may pose some physical risks, compromise patient privacy, or present other social hazards.” The AMA’s report identifies three specific recommendations: [Source] [Report: Radio Frequency ID Devices in Humans]

 

US – Think Tank Makes Case Against RFID Regulation

PRI, a California-based think tank with an openly free-market bent, this week released a primer on RFID, privacy, and government efforts at legislation of the technology. Entitled Playing Tag: An RFID Primer, the 11-page report is a worthwhile and concise wrap-up of the issues surrounding privacy and RFID.  [Source] [PRI Report]

 

US – OMB, DHS Outline Data Security Best Practices

The Office of Management and Budget and the Homeland Security Department this week explained 10 common mistakes agencies make when securing data and personal information and offered a host of best practices to correct each mistake. In a new paper, “Common Risks Impeding the Adequate Protection of Government Information,” OMB and DHS discuss common problems in areas such as training, contracting and records management. OMB and DHS developed this paper as a part of the President’s Identity Theft Task Force recommendations. [Source] [Paper]

 

US – Survey: Employees Pose the Biggest Security Risk

Put simply, the end user is the biggest issue when it comes to IT security, says Mark Loveless, white-hat hacker who goes by the handle “Simple Nomad.” It’s a concern echoed throughout InformationWeek Research’s 10th annual Global Information Security survey, conducted with consulting firm Accenture. Survey results indicate that simply educating employees and partners about a company’s security policies isn’t sufficient to keep generally honest people from letting customer information leak out through e-mails, instant messages, and peer-to-peer networks. While the No. 1 tactical security priority for U.S. companies in 2007, according to 37% of respondents, is creating and enhancing user awareness of policies, this is down from 42% in 2006. [Source] “They’ll click on anything, and if anything slows them down, they’ll short cut it,” said Loveless. [Source]

 

CA – Payment Industry Preps for Ontario Chip Card Trial

Canadian merchants may face a significant upgrade to their point of sale systems following an industry trial of next-generation debit and credit cards that incorporate a microchip as well as a mag stripe. Interac Association, MasterCard Canada, Visa Canada Association, and financial institutions such as TD Bank are planning the trial in September. A number of merchants throughout the Kitchener-Waterloo area have been set up with terminals that will accept the chip-based credit and debit cards. TD announced what it called the first successful transaction with a chip card at a Green Machine ATM at its corporate office in Mississauga, Ont. [Source]

 

EU – Report: Public Surveillance a Threat to Fundamental Rights

A new report from the Council of European Commission for Democracy has warned the widespread use of public surveillance is a threat to our “fundamental rights”. The Venice Commission also made recommendations on how personal freedoms could be protected. Recommendations include authorities and business to state the zones being filmed and set up a national body to guarantee the lawfulness of such installations, in line with the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights and the international texts governing the gathering and protection of data. [Source] [Report]

 

UK – Police Gain Data Protection Exemption for London Surveillance

Police in London have been granted exemption from the Data Protection Act to track the city’s motorists. Police will be given live access to London’s congestion charge cameras - allowing them to track all vehicles entering and leaving the zone. Anti-terror officers will be exempted from parts of the Data Protection Act to allow them to see the date, time and location of vehicles in real time. They previously had to apply for access on a case-by-case basis. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith blamed the ‘enduring vehicle-borne terrorist threat to London’ for the change.  [Source] [Source] [UK Surveillance Watchdog warns over number plate snooping]

 

US – New York Plans Surveillance Veil for Downtown

By the end of this year, police officials say, more than 100 cameras will have begun monitoring cars moving through Lower Manhattan, the beginning phase of a London-style surveillance system that would be the first in the United States. The Lower Manhattan Security Initiative, as the plan is called, will resemble London’s so-called Ring of Steel, an extensive web of cameras and roadblocks designed to detect, track and deter terrorists. British officials said images captured by the cameras helped track suspects after the London subway bombings in 2005 and the car bomb plots last month. If the program is fully financed, it will include not only license plate readers but also 3,000 public and private security cameras below Canal Street, as well as a center staffed by the police and private security officers, and movable roadblocks. [Source] See also: [Cameras, Cameras Everywhere] [NPR Interview] [Surveillance - the Next Generation] and [NZ Plane cameras a sign of the times] AND ALSO: [US Court: License Plate Checks don’t require search warrants]

 

US – Feds Scramble to Meet Data Breach Deadline

With only two months left before U.S. government agencies must figure out how to deal with data breaches and data theft, federal bureaucrats are scrambling to meet the looming deadline. The deadline was created by a White House directive published this spring that gave all federal agencies until September 22 to figure out the wisest way, using their “best judgment,” to come up with a plan to secure Americans’ personal data and to alert them if it falls into the wrong hands. [Source]

 

US – Ambitious US e-Government Project Targets Secure Data Sharing

A new project is aiming to allow U.S. government agencies to share data securely. The objective of the Secure Information Sharing Infrastructure (SISA) project is to create a system that allows data to be shared between the agencies, but in a way that ensures only the people who are authorized to access data are able to do so. Cisco Systems, Microsoft and EMC Corp. will provide commercial, off-the-shelf products, with smaller vendors contributing specific technologies. [Source] SEE ALSO: [CRS Publishes Report on Fusion Centers][EPIC's Page on Fusion Centers]

 

US – FBI Plans More Data-Mining, Profiling

The Federal Bureau of Investigations is developing a computer-profiling system that would enable investigators to target possible terror suspects, according to a Justice Department report submitted to Congress last week. The System to Assess Risk, or STAR, assigns risk scores to possible suspects based on a variety of information, similar to the way a credit bureau assigns a rating based on a consumer’s spending behavior and debt. The program focuses on foreign suspects but also includes data about some U.S. residents. A prototype is expected to be tested this year. [Source]

 

US – Senators Introduce Stringent Health Records Privacy Bill

A new bill introduced in the Senate today by Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) would place stringent restrictions on disclosures of personal health information and clear up at least some of the confusion surrounding federal privacy rules. If passed, the new bill would not supplant the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 but would require the Health and Human Services Department to revise HIPAA rules, according to a six-page summary the senators issued. “In America today, if you have a health record, you have a health privacy problem,” Leahy said in a statement. He heads the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is expected to consider the bill. [Source]

 

US – House Panel Slaps Limits on Sale of SSNs

A House of Representatives panel this week approved a bill that backers say will help fix the problem of Social Security number misuse and identity theft.  By a vote of 41 to 0, the House Ways and Means Committee voted for a 56-page bill that the panel’s chairman, New York Democrat Michael McNulty, said would “stop giving access to our Social Security number to every Tom, Dick or Harry who seeks it.”  The bill, called the Social Security Number Privacy and Identity Theft Protection Act, was introduced earlier this week. [Source] [Source]

 

US – Coalition of Groups Urges FTC to Investigate Background Checks on Rail Workers

A group comprised of privacy, civil liberties and labor advocates are asking the FTC to investigate alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) related to the dismissal of about 100 railroad workers after their employers conducted background checks. The complaint alleges several violations of the law, including failure to notify the employees that they were under investigation, according to this Washington Post story. The groups say FCRA requires “clear and conspicuous” disclosure to employees. The background checks were conducted at the recommendation of the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Department [Source]

 

 

--------