Privacy News Highlights
13–19 April 2007
Contents:
AU – Biometrics Error Rate Too High
SG – Citibank First Bank in the World to Introduce
Biometric Credit Card
CA – High
Risk of Canadian Data Falling Into Hands of US Government
CA –
Outsourcing Privacy Worries Prompt Scrutiny by Canadian Privacy Commissioner
CA –
Conservative MP Introduces ‘Clean Internet Act’
US – Survey: Customers Reject E-Commerce Sites That Have
Left Information Vulnerable
UK – National Research: Lack of Consumer Trust in the
Security of Personal Data
UK – Two Thirds of Workers Reveal Passwords for Chocolate
and A Pretty Smile
CA – British
Columbia Strikes Deal to Establish E-Medical Records System
US – GSA, DOD Seek Data Encryption Under SmartBuy
EU – EU Advisory Body Criticizes Google’s Privacy
Practices
US – PEW Report Released on Teens, Privacy and Online
Social Networks
US – OPEN Government Act Heads to Senate Floor
US – Massachusetts Police May Begin Searching Suspect
Kin’s DNA
CA – Canada
Debates Patient Privacy Rights
AU – Australian Doctors Sending Medical Files Overseas
US – Scope, Duration of TJX Breach May Indicate Inside
Job
UK – Websense Report: More Public Disclosure of
Information Leaks Needed
CA – BC
Bars’ ID Tracking System Under Scrutiny by BC Commissioner
UK – Experian Warns of Spike in Identity Theft In The UK
WW – Alexander Dix: Global Networks Need Built-In Privacy
Controls
WW – Google Vows to ‘DoubleProtect’ Consumer Privacy
WW – Google Releases New Tools to Remove Content from
Google Index
AU – Australia Broadcasting Corporation Appeals Against
Landmark Privacy Judgment
US – U.S. Limits Access to Student Loan Database
US – Ponemon Institute Releases Results of 2007 Most
Trusted Retail Banks
US – Arizona House Approves Bill to Strip SSNs from Some
Online Public Records
US – North Dakota Becomes Second State to Ban Forced RFID
Implantation
US – California Senate Fights RFID Tracking for
Schoolkids
WW – Report Says Rootkits Becoming Increasingly Complex
US – US Government Secure Configuration Mandate to Help
Everyone
WW – Paint May Cover Users When It Comes to Online
Privacy
US – GAO: Despite Advances, TSA TWIC Problems Remain
AU – Photo on Australia Card Vital, Says Ellison
EU – More than 1,000 People Demonstrate Against Big
Brother State
CA –
Manitoba to Slap Electronic Monitoring Bracelets in Worst Car Thieves
US – AT&T Settles In ‘Pretexting’ Case
US – Administration Seeks Warrantless Domestic
Surveillance Authority
US – Montana Governor Signs Bill Defying REAL ID Law
US – Washington Governor Signs Bill Rejecting REAL ID
US – Connecticut Kills Bill Giving Adults Access to Their
Adoption Records
US – DMA Reiterates Need for Data Security Legislation
US – Employees Surveilled, Sacked for Inappropriate
E-Mails, IM and Blogging
CA –
Full-Name Badges Breach Nurses’ Privacy
Electronic Frontiers Australia has called on the
federal Government to demonstrate whether its planned access card biometrics
system will work. “Human Services (Department) claims that one-to-many
biometric face-matching against a very large database is accurate enough to
detect fraudulent registrations, but this is not borne out by recent
evaluations of the technology,” EFA’s Greg Taylor said. “The performance of
facial recognition systems has improved in recent years, but error rates are
still very high. Several recent studies have dismissed facial recognition as
not feasible for large-scale databases.” With more than 16 million Australians
to be registered for the card before 2010, “the proposed database would be the
world’s largest rollout of a one-to-many matching system”, he said. “Given that
face-matching checks during registration will need to be made at an average
rate of 32,000 per day, substantial demands will be placed on the database and
on the personnel responsible for checking matches thrown up by the computer.” [Source]
Singaporeans will be among the first in the world to
use a biometric credit card. Citibank has chosen to launch its biometric credit
cards in Singapore. With the biometric payment system, shoppers no longer need
to carry or present their credit card and sign for payment. Instead, it will
just be a matter of having a finger scan followed by the keying in of a PIN
number. The bank is first introducing the card to some 190,000 cardholders
between the age of 25 and 34. The system uses technology belonging to Pay By
Touch, a global biometric authentication and payment solutions provider. Citibank
plans to eventually expand the service to all of its one million Singapore
customers. Besides credit payments, users will also be able to make debit
payments from their savings accounts. [Source] See also: [Keyboard
that recognizes typing ‘will cut ID theft] and [How
quickly did you type that password?]
A review of federal government contracts with private
companies found more than 50 cases where personal information about Canadians
was at significant risk of being subpoenaed by U.S. authorities under its
post-9/11 Patriot Act. According to a Treasury Board Secretariat memo obtained
through the Access to Information Act, at least one such contract was
ultimately cancelled and several renegotiations were undertaken to better
protect the data flowing across the border into the U.S. Those contracts
stemmed from seven federal institutions deemed as medium-to-high risks: Canada
Post, Justice, Industry Canada, Foreign Affairs, Public Works and Government Services,
International Trade and Canada Food Inspection Agency. [Source]
[Source]
Canada’s Privacy Commissioner is expressing concerns
over justice, health and other sensitive government records being managed by
private companies. The issue has been raised in a House of Commons committee examining
the protection of privacy and is already the subject of a study by B.C.’s
privacy commissioner. At issue are companies that are hired to manage or
process information on behalf of a government, many of whom also work for
private companies such as insurance firms. [Source]
Conservative MP Joy Smith this week introduced
the Clean
Internet Act (Bill C-427). The private member’s bill would establish an ISP
licensing system to be administered by the CRTC along with “know your
subscriber” requirements and content blocking powers. Smith introduced the bill
by warning against the use of the Internet to support human trafficking and
added that “the bill would address the fact that child pornography is not okay
to put on the Internet throughout our nation,” though the Criminal Code already
does that. The bill itself includes:
-
an ISP
licensing system to be administered by the CRTC that is defined so broadly that
it would seemingly capture anyone offering a wifi connection
-
“know
your subscriber” requirement where ISPs would be required to deny service to
past offenders
-
new
power that would allow the Minister of Industry to order an ISP to block access
to content that promotes violence against women, promotes hatred, or contains
child pornography. ISPs that fail to block face possible jail time for the
company’s directors and officers.
-
the
Minister of Industry can prescribe special powers to facilitate searches of
electronic data systems (ie. lawful access) [Source] [Source]
[Clean
Internet Act (Bill C-427)] See also [Jennings lawful access
bill]
Javelin Strategy has conducted a study that found that
77% of respondents said they planned to stop spending on sites that have
suffered data breaches. Companies that distinguish themselves as security
leaders will benefit, the survey found. The survey found that 85% of consumers
said they would spend more on sites they perceive to be secure. [Source]
A national survey of over 1,200 UK consumers,
conducted by Ipsos MORI, reveals that 91% of the country is bothered about the
protection of their personal data. 1 in 7 high earning consumers already
victims of data theft and more than half of consumers surveyed will take their
business elsewhere if data is lost. According to the survey, there is a clear
call for retailers to become more responsible in protecting their customers’
data. One quarter of those surveyed chose online retailers as the group they
most want to see being more proactive about protecting their data with a
similar number (22%) choosing high street retailers. But over half still see
the most important need as being political action by government bodies and
banks and building societies, mentioned by 58% of the total sample. Retailers
should heed the fact that 83% specify the security of their bank and credit
card details as being their primary concern in terms of data they want to see
protected. . [Source]
A survey by Infosecurity Europe of 300 office workers
and IT professionals has found that 64% were prepared to give their passwords
in exchange for a bar of chocolate and a smile. The survey also found that 67%
thought that someone else in their organisation knew their CEO’s password with
the most likely candidate being the secretary or PA. The survey was carried out
to find out how easy it was to extract peoples work passwords using social
engineering techniques with literally just the offer of a chocolate bar for
taking part in a survey. The survey was carried out amongst commuters in London
Stations and also at an IT exhibition full of computer professionals just to
see how much more security savvy they were compared with the average worker. [Source]
The B.C. government has reached a multi-million dollar
deal with Sun Microsystems and other partners to launch an e-medical record
system in the province. The project is the largest digital medical records
project in Canada. The system, which supporters tout as a way to improve
healthcare delivery, will allow doctors to access lab results, diagnostic
imaging and patients’ medical records. [Source]
[Source]
[Source]
See also [Infoway
Upbeat on EHR Progress]
The General Services Administration and the Defense
Department issued a request for quotations last week for full-disk encryption
or a file/folder encryption system under the government’s SmartBuy enterprise
software management program. The impetus behind the SmartBuy deal is an Office
of Management and Budget memo issued June 2006 requiring agencies to encrypt
all data on mobile devices. Many agencies have yet to meet that and other
requirements stated in the memo. A governmentwide blanket purchase agreement
would give chief information officers and chief information security officers
an easy way to identify and buy such software at a volume discount, according
to the RFQ. Released under GSA’s e-Buy program, the RFQ asks vendors on the GSA
schedule to submit a price quotation for implementing, maintaining, integrating
and training people to use encryption software for data at rest. [Source]
A European Union advisory body that monitors data privacy
has written a letter to Google Inc. warning the No. 1 provider of Internet
searches that its practices fall short of EU data protection standards,
according to a person familiar with the group’s plans. A Google spokeswoman confirmed
that Google received an earlier letter from the Norwegian Data Protection
Group, which has a representative on the regulatory body known as the Article
29 Working Party. [Source]
According to a new study, the majority of teens
actively manage their online profiles to keep the information they believe is
most sensitive away from the unwanted gaze of strangers, parents and other
adults. While many teens post their first name and photos on their profiles,
they rarely post information on public profiles they believe would help
strangers actually locate them such as their full name, home phone number or
cell phone number. At the same time, nearly two-thirds of teens with profiles
(63%) believe that a motivated person could eventually identify them from the
information they publicly provide on their profiles. The new report, based on a
survey and a series of focus groups conducted by the Pew Internet & American
Life Project examine how teens, particularly those with profiles online, make
decisions about disclosing or shielding personal information. Some 55% of
online teens have profiles and most of them restrict access to their profile in
some way. Of those with profiles, 66% say their profile is not visible to all
internet users. Of those whose profile can be accessed by anyone online, nearly
half (46%) say they give at least some false information. Teens post fake
information to protect themselves and also to be playful or silly. [Source] See
also: [OECD
Issues Report on User Generated Content] and [Spock’s
New People Engine]
Legislation that would help protect the public’s right
to know is one step closer to passing. Today the Senate Judiciary Committee
marked up the OPEN Government Act, which would provide some much needed updates
to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The bill now heads to the Senate
floor, and a similar bill has already passed in the House. [Source]
The Massachusetts State Police crime laboratory is
considering expanding the use of its DNA database to search for close relatives
of suspects whose DNA is recovered from crime scenes, a controversial
crime-fighting technique that prosecutors say would help them solve more cases
but that critics say would target innocent people, many of them members of
minority groups. [Source]
The case of an Alberta medical office clerk who
illegally checked the health records of her lover’s wife is being discussed at
a groundbreaking meeting on privacy. About 140 health and privacy experts are
in Regina at a health information privacy conference. They’re talking about the
best way to balance patients’ privacy with research, and are also hearing
stories about inappropriate use of health information. In Alberta, the medical
clerk accessed the records of her lover’s wife 17 times in an effort to
convince the man that his wife was terminally ill with cancer. Last week, the
clerk was fined $10,000 for illegally obtaining health records. Alberta privacy
commissioner Frank Work says the fine sets an important precedent for health-care
providers and sends the message that breaches won’t be tolerated. [Source]
See also [Banking on
privacy: States and the federal government take contrasting approaches to
building large medical record repositories] [Health
information privacy is crucial] [‘Horror stories’ heard
as Prairie experts meet to discuss health privacy] [US: Not
all agree with health-privacy week’s focus] [AHIMA
and the American Medical Informatics Association Position on Privacy and PHRs]
Australian doctors are breaching privacy laws and
could endanger patients’ lives by sending their medical files overseas to be
typed up cheaply, it has been reported. An investigation found a growing number
of Australian hospitals and medical practices are outsourcing secretarial work
to companies in India, Pakistan and the Philippines. At least 4 Sydney
hospitals and hundreds of doctors are using cheap labour to transcribe
digitally recorded verbal notes online. [Source] [Offshore
medical records ‘not at risk’]
A TJX spokeswoman told AP that the company
investigation is looking at the potential that the intrusion may have been the
work of insiders. Several factors point to possible insider involvement,
including the 17-month duration of the breach and the intruder’s apparent
knowledge of the company’s electronic encryption keys. However, the company’s
investigation, which involves more than 50 experts, has not reached any
conclusions so far, according to its March 28 regulatory filing. [Source] [TJX Thieves Had Time
to Steal, Trip Up]
US – Social
Security Administration Employee Charged in Identity Fraud Case: A former Social Security Administration
employee has been charged with disclosing personally identifiable information
taken from a government computer, which was used to commit identity fraud by
another to the tune of US $2.5 million. If convicted on all charges, the
employee could be sentenced to as many as 15 years in prison. The conspirator
already pleaded guilty last fall to charges of conspiracy and unlawful
possession of a means of identification. The SSA employee allegedly received US
$20 for each query she ran that obtained information. [Source]
UK – UK
Policeman Gets Jail Time for Stealing Data from National Police Database: A UK police officer who provided personal
information from a national police database to a known violent offender has had
his sentence increased to nine months in jail. The officer pleaded guilty to
malfeasance in a public office for accessing the police national computer
database with the intent of providing another with personal information of
three people. An appeal from the Attorney General increased his punishment to
nine months in jail. [Source]
[Source]
US – CVS latest
retailer cited for identity theft violation: The Texas Attorney General has taken legal action
against CVS Pharmacy for exposing customers to identity theft. According to a
press release issued by Attorney General Greg Abbott’s office on Tuesday,
employees at a CVS store in Liberty, Texas, chucked hundreds of customer
records into a dumpster behind the storefront. Left in the trash were documents
including customers’ names, addresses, Social Security numbers, credit card
numbers, prescriptions and doctors, according to the release. Many of the
credit and debit card numbers were still active when found, the release says,
as expiration dates were included in the information. [Source]
[UCSF computer
server with research subject information is stolen] [Feds: ID Theft
Ring Run From Prison] [UK: 100,000
Bulldog ISP customer details Stolen] [6
years in prison for stealing hundreds of identities [Hospital Billing &
Collection Service Inc.]
A survey conducted by Websense at this year’s e-Crime
Congress in London suggests that employees are the greatest risk to any
organisation’s data and intellectual property. Some 95% of the 105
international security professionals surveyed said that their company would not
be confident of knowing about an information leak, and 64% believed that the
board would be held responsible should a leak occur. One in seven respondents
believe that data leaks are widespread, and 15% indicated that most companies
have experienced some form of data leak in the past 12 months. Internal threats
such as data leakage through malicious intent or by accident continues to be
the greatest concern, topping the poll at 59%. This represents a 15% increase
on last year’s annual e-Crime Congress survey. Furthermore, 79 per cent believe
that legislation should be in place to curb data leakage and to ensure greater
transparency in the advent of an information breach. [Source]
B.C. Privacy Commissioner David Loukidelis is
investigating the use of a high-tech system used by Vancouver bars to track
unruly patrons. The system scans a customer’s ID upon entry and takes a
photograph of them. Clubs are now sharing information about certain customers.
Loukidelis recently has made the investigation a priority after learning more
about the system. A spokesman for Loukidelis said the office is concerned about
the information collected, the security of the data and with whom the
information is shared after its collection. [Source]
Reports of identity theft have increased 69% in 2006
over the same period the previous year, according to Experian. The company
warned that in the UK, 2,124 people called the agency’s hotline for identity
theft victims. Gary Wood, Managing Director of Experian’s fraud prevention
operations, said that ID thieves are using victims’ current addresses when
applying for credit, which increases the chances of approval. The agency also
said that it has detected a shift from ID thieves rummaging through garbage to
steal personal information to more sophisticated ID theft rings. [Source]
See also: [Hoofnagle:
Opinion: Banks Should Provide More Transparency On Identity Theft]
Dr. Alexander Dix, Chairman of the International
Working Group on Data Protection, said that global networks – to be successful
– must have built-in privacy protections. Surveillance of online activities
will undermine trust, he said. Dix recently called for a “uniform privacy law
that would give consumers control over their personal information.” [Source]
See also: [Invention: Xerox’s
All-knowing browser] [Xerox
patent application: User Profile Classification By Web Usage Analysis] See
also: [
When Google announced its purchase of the internet’s
largest placer of banner ads, DoubleClick, last Friday for $3.1 billion in
cash, the search and text-ad giant took a big step closer to online
omniscience, and immediately drew the ire of privacy advocates and competitors.
Google’s acquisition of the ad company – which pioneered the business of
tracking consumers from website to website – will make it even easier for
Google to create profiles on internet users, without being transparent about
what it is doing, charges the Center for Digital Democracy. A preemptive
complaint to government regulators against the search giant is likely. The FTC
is already investigating the internet advertising industry’s data practices,
following a complaint in November. But Google says that internet users will
actually have more privacy now that it has acquired DoubleClick. The company
recently announced it would standardize its data retention policy for all its
services, and would remove identifying details from data more than 18 months
old. It promises to bring that newfound commitment to user privacy to
DoubleClick. “Users will benefit from our commitment to protecting user privacy
following the acquisition,” said a Google spokeswoman. “We’re exploring a
number of ideas that will better safeguard user privacy while providing
advertisers no less information about their ad placement and performance than
they receive today.” [Source]
[Google
to pay $3.1B for DoubleClick] [Microsoft
and Others Oppose Google’s Purchase of DoubleClick on Privacy, Antitrust
Grounds] [Expert:
Potential Sale Of DoubleClick Raises Privacy Concerns] [DoubleClick’s
History] See also:
Google has released some new tools to help those
looking to remove their content from the search giant’s indexes. The new tools
are mix of options for site owners to quickly remove pages and cached copies of
pages, as well as more general options to request the removal of any page. [Source]
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation has lodged an
appeal against a landmark judgment that awarded one of Australia’s first
payouts for invasion of privacy. County Court judge Felicity Hampel this month
awarded $234,190, plus about $65,500 in interest, to a rape victim named in an
ABC radio news broadcast. The woman, who can be identified only by the
pseudonym Jane Doe, sued the ABC, a reporter and a sub-editor over the 2002
broadcasts. Judge Hampel ruled the defendants were negligent, breached the
woman’s privacy, and committed a breach of confidence and of their statutory
duty. The woman was awarded damages for post-traumatic stress, loss of earnings
and medical expenses as well as compensation for hurt and distress, embarrassment,
humiliation and shame. But in documents lodged with the Court of Appeal, the
defendants say Judge Hampel erred in law by finding the existence of a tort of
invasion of privacy in Australia. [Source]
The US Department of Education has cut off outside
access to a government database that contains the personal financial
information of millions of student aid applicants. The department acted on
concerns that loan companies or other marketers were improperly obtaining
private information on potential borrowers. The shutdown, announced by
Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, is its strongest response to a
broadening student loan scandal that has already implicated loan companies and
caused several universities to put their financial aid administrators on leave
and review their dealings with lenders.[Source]
[Lawnakers wants lenders blocked from student
data] [Lenders
Searching Student Database Sparks Privacy Fears] [Student
Loan Companies Access U.S. Department of Education’s Student Database]
Privacy and information management research firm the
Ponemon Institute announced the results of the 2007 Privacy Trust Study for
Retail Banking, measuring consumer perceptions of trustworthiness for retail
banking institutes. In its sixth year, the study examines how issues related to
consumer privacy and data security, and the ways in which retail banking
institutions address those issues, translate to consumer opinion. ... Overall,
privacy trust scores for all top twenty banks increased slightly from 2006.
However, banks that experienced a significant data breach event saw a decline
in their privacy trust scores. [Source] [Source]
House lawmakers gave preliminary approval to a bill
that would protect residents of Maricopa County from identity theft by ensuring
that users who access county records will not be able to see Social Security
numbers. The bill would apply to records in the state’s largest county because
officials there already have purchased software to redact the SSNs from
records. County recorders in the state’s 14 other counties will have to redact
SSNs from Web-based public records only upon request. [Source]
As expected, North
Dakota has become the second state in the U.S. to ban the forced implanting of
radio frequency identification (RFID) chips in people. The two-sentence bill, passed
by the state legislature, was signed into law by Gov. John Hoeven last
Wednesday. Essentially, it forbids anyone from compelling someone else to have
an RFID chip injected into their skin. The state follows in the steps of
Wisconsin, which passed similar legislation last year. “We need to strike a
balance as we continue to develop this technology between what it can do and
our civil liberties, our right to privacy,” Hoeven said in an interview. He
emphasized that the law doesn’t prohibit voluntary chipping. Military personnel
who want an RFID chip injected so they can be more easily tracked will still be
allowed to get a chip. There are also potential uses for the technology in
corrections or in monitoring animals, he noted. [Source]
California’s state Senate approved legislation last
week that would prohibit public schools from requiring the implementation of
radio-wave devices that broadcast students’ personal identification and monitor
their movement around campus. The bill was introduced by Democrat Sen. Joe
Simitian and sent to Assembly on a 28-5 vote. “The reason we have this level of
support is it is a narrowly crafted bill, Simitian told the Associated Press. “We’re
dealing only with mandatory use that tells parents they don’t get to be in
charge of their kids’ personal information.” The bill provisions would expire
in 2011. [Source]
[California
Senate OKs bill banning student monitoring devices]
According to a security report released yesterday by
McAfee, Complexity in rootkits is growing at a phenomenal rate, allowing
malicious software to burrow deep and potentially go undetected inside
Microsoft’s Windows platform. McAfee said rootkits have grown over the past
five years from 27 components to 2,400. [Source] See also: [Targeted E-Mail Attacks
Increasing: Report]
A panel of experts instrumental in the development of
the recent Office of Management and Budget (OMB) security mandate regarding
standardized configurations of Windows operating systems on government
computers helped elucidate the benefits it brings not only to government
systems, but also to systems in the private sector. Analysis from the National
Security Agency (NSA) indicates that the mandated secure settings block more
than 85% of common attack vectors. Furthermore, because the agencies are
required to deploy secure system configurations, vendors will need to make sure
applications work appropriately within those configurations. “Each time a
vendor solves the problem for one federal agency, it solves it for all agencies
and for every other organization that buys that application and uses the secure
configuration.” [OMB
Memo to Agency Heads] [OMB
Memo to CIOs] [Microsoft
Windows XP security configurations] and [Here] [Source] [Source]
[Source]
A U.S. manufacturer is selling paint that is billed as
an electromagnetic shield that would prevent hackers from breaking into
wireless systems. EMSEC Technologies, which is selling the paint for $6
per-square-foot, says the product would completely secure a data room from
intrusion. It would not be suitable, however, for an entire office because it
blocks radio signals, which would prevent mobile devices from receiving or
sending signals. [Source]
The
Transportation Security Administration has improved its management of the
Transportation Workers Identification Credential (TWIC) in the last six months,
but problems remain in ensuring effectiveness and compatibility of the TWIC
cards and readers in the field, according to testimony this week by the
GAO. There are concerns about educating workers, maintaining a timetable for
enrollment and dealing with background checks for all the workers, GAO said. In
addition, the TWIC card and reader technologies and their validations remain
problematic. Overall, it won’t be possible to fully judge the effectiveness of
TSA’s management of TWIC until enrollment begins, and setting realistic
schedules is a key concern, the GAO said. [testimony] See also: [Trust
and Logistics Key to Standard Employee ID Cards] [Rapid Expansion of
Smart Cards in Government Evident]
A photograph, signature and personal number will be
retained as key elements of the Howard Government’s new Access Card, despite
backbench protests this will make it a de facto identity card. Human Services
Minister Chris Ellison, who shelved legislation delivering the card last month
pending further consultation, said that the concerns raised by his colleagues
did not reflect community views. His comments came despite a report by the
Senate’s finance and public administration committee in which Coalition
senators joined the Opposition to call for a delay and reconsideration of the
plan. The committee was particularly worried about a proposal that the card
include a biometric photograph, warning that this would increase the likelihood
of its becoming a “de facto national ID card”. [Source]
[Access
card under fire over ID concerns] See also: [Spain eID “Going
Smoothly”]
At a recent demonstration in Frankfurt-on-the-Main
between 1,500 and 2,000 civil rights campaigners visibly came out against what
they describe as “rampant surveillance.” On their placards the demonstrators
compared privacy to oxygen and noted that it was high time to stop branding
data protection “a crime.” The protesters vehemently lambasted the highly
controversial new anti-terror
legislation intended to expand Germany’s surveillance structure
significantly and, among other things, give the police automatic access to
digital passport photos and the fingerprints that will in future be stored on
German ID documents. They also excoriated the plans currently being discussed
to retain telephone call
and Internet data, search
PCs surreptitiously via the Net, the drive to expand the video surveillance
of public spaces, the practice of passing on Passenger Name Records (PNRs) and
the proposals for automatic
scanning and database comparison of number plates of vehicles traveling or
parked on public roads. [Source] [German
minister wants access to private computers] [German government
approves retention of data]
Mayor Sam Katz praised this week’s announcement by the
Doer government to outfit the 20 worst car thieves in Manitoba with an
electronic monitoring device. “The only thing they should be wearing is cold,
hard steel,” Katz said in reference to the Global Positioning Satellite-based
devices. [Source]
See also: [Tag elderly
people, says UK science minister]
AT&T has settled with 13 data brokers it accused
of fraudulently obtaining customer phone records after the brokers agreed to
pay an undisclosed cash settlement and to not seek customer data in the future.
The lawsuits were AT&T’s first involving so-called pretexting, where
customer data is accessed by people posing as customers to get unauthorized
online accounts where they could see calling records and other information. [Source]
The US administration has proposed a bill to relax
certain legal restrictions on the government’s ability to intercept telephone
calls and other communications in the U.S.. The proposal would change
provisions in the primary law on domestic surveillance that the Bush
administration says limit its ability to spy on the domestic and international
communications of foreigners and would provide new legal immunity for
telecommunications companies that have been sued for cooperating with the
government as it conducts domestic wiretapping. But the proposed changes to the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 face resistance in
Congress. Democratic lawmakers have been pressing for more oversight of the
domestic eavesdropping run by the NSA before they agree to amend the laws, and
they have become increasingly concerned by disclosures of abuses in other data
collection programs, too. [Source]
[Source]
[Administration
press release 2007-04-13] [Draft bill]
See also: [NYT: Who’s
Watching the F.B.I.? “national-security letters”] [Jeffrey
Rosen: Trust Waning In Wake Of Revelations About FBI Abuses (New York Times
Magazine article) ]
Gov. Brian Schweitzer said ‘no, nope, no way, hell no’
Tuesday to national driver’s licenses, signing into law a bill supporters say
is one of the strongest rejections to the federal plan. The move means the
state won’t comply with the Real ID Act, a federal law that sets a national
standard for driver’s licenses and requires states to link their record-keeping
systems to national databases. Though several states have either passed or are
considering resolutions or bills against the act, Montana is the first state to
outright deny its implementation, according to the ACLU. [Source]
As part of a growing state rebellion, Gov. Christine
Gregoire this week signed a bill rejecting REAL ID. Legislatures in four other
states - Maine, Idaho, Arkansas and Montana - also have adopted measures
opposing REAL ID, and lawmakers in more than 20 other states are considering
similar action. The measure will prohibit state implementation of the REAL ID
Act, unless the federal government fully funds it and provides stronger
protections for the privacy of Washington drivers. The measure (SB 5087) passed
both chambers of the legislature with bipartisan support, including an overwhelming
95-2 vote in the House. [Source] See
also ACLU’s RealNightmare
An effort to resurrect a bill allowing adult adopted
children to obtain their birth certificates when they turn 21 fizzled last week
amid concerns the legislation would lead to more abortions. The 16-24 defeat in
the Judiciary Committee came nearly a year after Gov. M. Jodi Rell vetoed a
similar bill, arguing it violated privacy rights of birth mothers who put their
children up for adoption believing their identities would remain confidential.
The governor asked lawmakers to draft a bill this session that balances the
privacy of birth parents with the desire of adoptees to seek their birth
information. [Source]
[Source]
The Direct Marketing Association has again called for
legislation that would create a national standard for notifying consumers in
the event of the loss or theft of personal data without impeding the legitimate
exchange of data necessary for electronic commerce. The Senate Committee on
Commerce, Science and Transportation is expected to introduce a data security
bill in the next two weeks. In a letter sent last week to committee leaders the
DMA outlined the principles it supports for any data security legislation. [Source]
OTHER NEWS:: [California
Assembly Committee Passes Data Breach Bill] [Texas
House Votes to Shield Handgun Owners’ Names]
American firms have stepped up surveillance on
employee e-mail traffic, Web-surfing and blogging activities on company
networks as workers’ online conduct take a hefty toll on U.S. employers. E-mail
mismanagement has resulted in costly lawsuits against corporations, and
businesses are responding by firing more workers who violate corporate computer
policies, according to the ePolicy Institute, an online risk consultancy
organization. More than 26% of the 400 American companies surveyed by the
institute and the American Management Association (AMA) last year terminated
employees for e-mail misuse. Another 2% dismissed workers for inappropriate
instant messaging (IM) chat and 2% fired workers for creating offensive blog
content. The ePolicy/AMA survey showed that 24% of U.S. companies have been
ordered by a court or regulatory body to produce employee e-mail. 15% of the
companies said they fought a workplace lawsuit triggered by a sexual or racial
harassment claim involving employee e-mail. [Source]
See also: [EU
Court Ruling: Employers May Not Spy on Staff By Secretly Monitoring Emails]
and [Even
White House Aides Deserve Privacy When It Comes To Email] [Employers warned on
email spying]
Nurses in Prince Edward Island, a province of Canada,
have won the right not to wear name tags displaying their full names as the
result of a recent ruling by Acting Privacy Commissioner, Karen Rose. She ruled
that a nurse in a long-term care facility should not be required to display
both her first and family names, because doing so could expose her to an
immediate personal risk. [Source]
--------