The last day of voting in the British Columbia provincial election is on Saturday, October 19th.
We sent questions to political parties who had sitting members in the previous legislature and were running candidates in the current election on October 7th. Their deadline to respond was October 16th.
Here are the responses and the date we received them.
Here are the parties yet to respond. Follow the link to give them some encouragement.
Here are the questions we sent them.
Question 1 – Potential of law reform
If elected to form government, will you reform laws and improve:
Question 2 – Law reform in action
How will you act on reforms in these areas?
Question 3 – Recordkeeping of information assets
Records need to be both created and managed effectively. Recordkeeping promotes effective public governance and establishes a common source of reference for public employees, it is a prerequisite to both evidence-based and data-driven decision-making.
If elected to form Government, what steps will you take to:
Question 4 – BC Code of Practice verification
Please provide a signed version of your party’s Political Campaign Activity Code of Practice.
Question 5 – OIPC guidance activities
What steps is your party taking to comply with the code of practice and the BC OIPC Guidance Document: Political Campaign Activity?
Question 6 – Upcoming Parliamentary Committees
Every six years Parliamentary Committees are appointed to review the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and the Personal Information Protection Act. The next Parliament will likely preside over and participate in the: Special Committee to Review the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act; and the Special Committee to Review the Personal Information Protection Act.
Question 7 – Information Management Act issues
The triple delete scandal impacted both the public and Government. Monitoring indicates that the Information Management Act (IMA), while touted as a solution, has done little to improve information management in core government or the broader public sector. Past OIPC Commissioner McEvoy indicated that the IMA is not fit for ensuring the government’s compliance with the duty to document because the heads of government bodies are primarily responsible for ensuring compliance with the duty under that Act without oversight. The Commissioner also stated that the lack of authority of his office to provide independent oversight to the “vitally important duty to document” is “a significant shortcoming” of FIPPA.
Question 8 – Addressing UBCIC calls to action.
The Union of BC Indian Chiefs UBCIC has recently released a message to the Federal Government seeking Immediate, Concrete Action to Remove First Nations’ Barriers to Accessing Information. In it they call for the Federal Government to uphold Canada’s legal obligations under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UN Declaration) and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (UNDA), with an emphasis on the information rights of Indigenous peoples. The call directed to the federal Government highlights issues equally relevant at the provincial level.
Question 9 – Transparency in the BC Legislature
Following the wood splitter speaker scandal in 2019, the Information and Privacy Commissioner, Ombudsperson, and the Merit Commissioner wrote a joint letter calling for increased transparency and accountability in the legislature that was agreed to be acted upon by all parties of the Legislative Assembly Management Committee. There was no subsequent announcement of action taken.
Question 10 – FOIPPA issues
The issues surrounding updates implemented by this Government to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act are many as detailed in the FIPA backgrounder. The public has consistently seen reduced trust in public bodies, and this is partially attributed to issues around lack of transparency. The imposition of a 10-dollar application fee to ask the government for information has set a dangerous president and barrier. This Transparency Tax has created a barrier for access to information across British Columbia. The unregulated use of fees means some public bodies routinely use the fee to avoid scrutiny while others struggle to implement it. The analysis of the information means the number of requests is dropping, costs are going up and less information is being released on request. People and public bodies are literally paying more and receiving less.
November 6, 2024 Election Survey Review
Check out responses in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan or the original questionnaires.
Interested in being part of activities like this?
There are lots of ways to work with us or act as an Academic Advisor. We are always open to making our research results better so be sure to provide any feedback and constructive criticism regarding this publication to FIPA at fipa.bc.ca .